Sony has come under fire recently for aclause in its terms of servicethat asks users to waive their right to a class action lawsuit in exchange for PlayStation Network services. Many have asked how Sony can even get away with such a condition, but Sony’s answer is simple — AT&T did it, sotheycan do it.

“The Supreme Court recently ruled in the AT&T case that language like this is enforceable,” stated the company. “The updated language in the TOS is designed to benefit both the consumer and the company by ensuring that there is adequate time and procedures to resolve disputes.”

Article image

The latter part of the quote is pretty much a copy/paste of what Sony told Destructoid when we asked about the clause. When I first heard about this, I wasn’t too bothered, but given how sick I’ve gotten of corporations wanting the rights of people without any of the responsibilities, I’m not so sure anymore. This is a country where corporate newsrefuses to cover protestsbecause it makes other corporations look bad, so I’m beginning to grow a little disturbed that stuff like this is allowable.

I especially get leery when a corporate mouthpiece simply says, “A ruling said it’s legal.” Smacks a little scarily too much of the, “We did it because we can” attitude. That’s not a healthy attitude.

Hell is Us gameplay reveal

It would be nice for the supreme court to make a few more rulings that benefitrealhuman beings, as opposed to the lawless, incorporeal new race of creatures that America has birthed and called “companies.”

If you want to opt out of the clause,find out how!

Black Ops 6 Season 5 Multiplayer Ransack Mode

Sony: Supreme Court ruling spurred changes to PlayStation terms[CNN]

Tekken Tag Tournament 2: a black and white Jin and Heihachi stand back-to-back.

PEAK Bing Bong plushie

Silent Hill f: a woman’s face covered in blossoming but deadly looking flowers.

Mei NERF gun in OW2

Battlefield 6 vehicles combat

Several men standing and watching at an explosion in the distance in Battlefield 6.

BO7 key art